Sunday, May 27, 2018

In Memoriam

In memory of all the animals who have died from human abuse, misuse and indifference.



Animals in War Memorial. Park Lane, London
































Sunday, May 20, 2018

So sad: we live in an age that requires protecting animals

Horse Rescue United 
Will a time ever come when the phrase “protecting animals” isn’t used or even recognized by people in our so-called “civilization”? A time when legislators don’t have to debate about what group or agency can best protect New Jersey animals?  A time when federal laws aren’t necessary to “protect farm animals” (that is, slaughter them more humanely), and when “preserves” need not be established, and patrolled, to protect elephants and other wild animals? 

Speciesism and dominionism, coupled with human carelessness and overriding greed, when  focused on non-human animals who can’t speak or fight for themselves, make for a deadly combination, one requiring ever more animal protection.  

This week’s newspaper described the legal requirement for country prosecutors and municipal police departments to take over enforcing animal-control laws from the NJSPCA.  While my experience with the NJSPCA isn’t extensive, it’s been enough to jaundice my view of its approaches and effectiveness.

However, numerous people (including those charged with the take-over) are arguing for more time to implement the law -- passed in January and effective August 1.  How satisfactorily will this be resolved, and how quickly?  For now, as usual, animals needing all the help they can get are in the middle, left in limbo. (I invite readers with info and insights on this issue to comment.)

Meanwhile, in Chad, African elephants are thriving and multiplying after years of death and decimation by ivory poachers.  But to reach this happy position, it took a leader who cares about animal conservation yet has a horrible human rights record, and “imported” South African experts to set things to rights.  Only lately have locals been encouraged to accept and protect their country’s animals.

So, this desirable result occurred through a seriously flawed process.  

a shining star of protection

Back in New Jersey, animal advocates keep on plugging.  One group -- the Animal Protection League of NJ (www.aplnj.org) -- marks its 35th anniversary of action for animals this year. Newly re-designed, APL’s website provides an easy overview of the organization’s laudable scope and goals, as well as its needs.  (There is never enough monetary support for activism, and volunteers who speak out and pitch in are always welcome.)

Angi Metler, co-founder and executive director, says, “Our website will always be a work in progress, as we welcome new input and suggestions.  If anyone notices something missing, let us know.”

Why not check out the new APLNJ website right now? 

Aren’t  you thirsty yet?

Harry 
“Water, water everywhere, / Nor any drop to drink.” Harry and Billy Summers better not try that “Ancient Mariner” line on me, even though it seems to be their mantra. These two cats are, and have long been, “water teetotalers,” which worries me. My only solace: they consume a lot of water with their canned food and they keep getting good vet reports.

Yet I regularly see articles the importance of cat-hydration, together with tips for how to lead a cat to water and make him drink.  So I’ve been sure to keep water (and food too) far removed from litterbox areas; I’ve regularly changed the water in bowls on two floors -- apparently untouched day after day -- and I’ve sometimes added ice cubes and enthusiastically pointed them out.  

No, I haven’t tried a fountain, even though cats reportedly love moving water.  Nor have I taught either of the Summers boys to sit in a sink and turn on the water, as I’ve seen happen online. A can of chicken broth has sat on a counter for weeks while I consider whether and how to add it to their water bowls.  Chicken-flavored water?!

Any suggestions, readers?  
http://www.catster.com/lifestyle/cats-drink-more-water-health



#

If you subscribe to this blog and want to comment, please go to 
1moreonce.blogspot.com  

Sunday, May 13, 2018

For the love of elephants

Gabon landscape

The sentence that snapped me into consciousness of  the wild animal I feel most strongly about was: “Can you imagine a world without elephants?” 

That was years ago.  Of course, my answer to the question was a resounding “NO!  I don’t want to imagine such a thing! The world needs elephants!  Elephants must live!”  And so on. Then, learning that elephant extinction was a real possibility, as these giant, intelligent, family-oriented animals were being slaughtered en masse, for their tusks -- to make ivory trinkets for inhumane, greedy fools -- I was horrified by what was happening to elephants, and why. 

                                                        Save the Elephants image
And now, despite appeals to save the elephants from a wide diversity of people (a famous Asian basketball player, an American movie star and other celebrities, world-renowned elephant-protectors and their organizations. . . and everyday people who donate, write and march), elephants are still in great jeopardy.  

Why?  For me, the many possible reasons for elephants’ continued slaughter come down to one: human greed.  Despite responsibility to protect elephants or expressed good intentions or seeming moral strength, money wins out and elephants (continue to) die.   

This message is the central point of Mlima’s Tale, Lynn Nottage’s play running in NYC through June 3.  For me, it was brilliant, and depressing, theater.  Mlima is a famous “big tusker” in Kenya who, early in the play, is killed by poachers for his tusks.  Then follow the attempts by all involved to get away with the murder and make money on the tusks.

They do so.  Sickeningly. 
   
Satao
Throughout the play, all the characters’ interactions are accompanied by the ghost of Mlima, powerfully portrayed by one of the show’s four actors.  Not one person who encounters the tusks and the drive to smuggle them out of Kenya and sell them sounds the alarm.  Not one.  The tusks of the mighty elephant become “an exquisite ivory set in the penthouse of a rich connoisseur,” as the reviewer puts it, adding this killer point: “unconditional virtue is nonexistent within the international system of economic power that keeps the play’s world spinning.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/15/theater/mlimas-tale-review-lynn-nottage.html

As long as that remains true -- is human nature likely to change? -- elephants don’t stand a chance.  

The story of what’s happening to elephants can make misanthropes of those of us who believe reason and “humanity” will prevail.  Fools that we are.  And media stories about new ways to help save elephants can’t quite generate the optimism they may have fostered before.  The realization that most humans would rather make money than stop iconic, sentient beings from being slaughtered is overwhelming. . . and seems to be reinforced every day.

Hamilton
In spite of all that, I will continue to read, write and donate as I can because I can’t stand the idea of doing nothing for elephants.  The organization I trust is "Save the Elephants" (www.savetheelephants.org), founded by Dr. Iain Douglas Hamilton, a scientist considered one of the world’s foremost authorities on African elephants.  I’ve read about him for years and thought he was very impressive at a NYC demo a few years ago.  (To donate to Save the Elephants, click “Donate” then scroll down for the Wildlife Conservation Network (WCN), a San Francisco-based US partner to STE.)   

The sentence that most recently hit me hard was: “One elephant killed every 15 minutes.”  Mlima’s Tale continues.  Save the elephants.

Yao Ming with orphaned baby elephant


#

If you subscribe to this blog and want to comment, please go to 1moreonce.blogspot.com  

Saturday, May 5, 2018

Spring brings both bad news & good

So, can we safely assume that spring is unstoppable at this point?  Shades of green everywhere, from soft new tree leaves to brilliant grasses, accented by varied yellows, pinks and whites, with more recent lilac additions -- they can’t possibly revert to browns and grays now, can they?

Once safely into springtime, we’re also UN-safely into tick and mosquito season, which many of us have good reason to dread.  For those who are prey to these jumping and flying pests -- the nicest word for them -- here’s useful info about why they’re proliferating and how to combat them.  (Right, this is a blog about animals, but we definitely don’t like or welcome all of them!)

No room in my last post, about two confusing black birds, to mention other names for crows and ravens: collective nouns.  If you see a number of crows, for instance, sure, you could refer to them as “a flock of crows,” and be accurate.  But more poetically, you could refer to them as “a murder of crows.”  Doesn’t that add a nice sinister note?   

As for a mundane “group of ravens,” try “an unkindness of . . .” or “a conspiracy of ravens” -- much more colorful. That wording better suggests connections like Hitchcock’s movie The Birds or Poe’s poem “The Raven.”

Shades of the collective noun “clowder” for a group of cats, right?  Another option there, btw, is “clutter” of cats, which seems especially apropos now, in the thick of kitten season. And for many of us ailurophiles, “a pounce of cats” says it too.

Safer flights, we hope

After a series of mishaps and one death for pets involved with United Airlines, the company has announced new policies and customer requirements for pet air transportation. Aimed at improving the safety of the travel experience for animals, they take effect Monday, June 18, and will be modified as needed afterward.  This link leads you to all that, and more.



Tell it to the . . . Gov

Please keep up the pressure with frequent polite phone calls to Governor Murphy: remind him of his pledge to end New Jersey’s bear hunts.  609-292-6000.

In an earlier stage of our development most human groups held to a tribal ethic. Members of the tribe were protected, but people of other tribes could be robbed or killed as one pleased. Gradually the circle of protection expanded, but as recently as 150 years ago we did not include blacks. So African human beings could be captured, shipped to America, and sold. In Australia white settlers regarded Aborigines as a pest and hunted them down, much as kangaroos are hunted down today. Just as we have progressed beyond the blatantly racist ethic of the era of slavery and colonialism, so we must now progress beyond the speciesist ethic of the era of factory farming, of the use of animals as mere research tools, of whaling, seal hunting, kangaroo slaughter, and the destruction of wilderness. We must take the final step in expanding the circle of ethics.
-Peter Singer, philosopher and professor of bioethics (1946-  )

                                                                                   #


If you subscribe to this blog and wish to comment, please go to 1moreonce.blogspot.com