Sunday, October 27, 2019

It’s past time for NJ’s bear hunt to be ended -- for good

                                                                                                        Bill Lea pic

In six days earlier this month, hunters killed 265 New Jersey black bears.  That’s an average of 44 bears, cubs and adults, a day. 

For the first three days, hunters were restricted to bows and arrows.  After that, archers and muzzle-loading rifle hunters were “allowed to participate,” as the Times of Trenton reported, as if discussing a party or a dance.   On Monday, Dec. 9, the firearms-only bear hunt resumes for six more days.
  
“Most of the bears harvested [so far] this year were culled in Sussex, Warren and Morris counties,” the story said, first using a euphemism more appropriate for vegetables than for innocent sentient beings, and then using a word that in wildlife management usually refers to removing a sick or weak animal from a herd or flock. 

But the 265 black bears just killed by hunters were not necessarily sick or weak -- they were simply “killable” -- that is, visible, possibly drawn by bait, or they just happened by . . . and so they were killed.  There was no selection of which bears should die; there were simply hunters out there ready to kill bears.

“Culling” is bad enough for the animals; indiscriminate killing is worse. 

All of which raises the question:  Why? 

Sometimes the reason given is that bears can be nuisances.  They may raid humans’ garbage cans or bird feeders, jeopardize pets’ safety, scare people.  But how many humans in bear country use bear-proof trash containers?  And what kind of enforcement occurs to assure they do?

The numbers of phone calls about nuisance bears are often cited as an excuse for the bear hunt.  But even if those numbers are valid, they would surely drop dramatically if people used bear-proof garbage containers. 

Without the recommended receptacles and without enforcement, what’s left?  A bear hunt, in which any bear in the hunters’ sights may be killed.  And that’s why this state’s bear hunt comes across as little more than a trophy hunt -- with innocent bears being killed.   

                                                                                Kehoe pic
I doubt that those hunting the bears are people irate that their garbage bins were raided; somehow, I think they’re just people who think it’s "sport" to kill bears (by whatever poacher-means necessary, like baiting). . . just people eager to brag about the bear(s) that didn’t get away. 

This bear hunt is a trophy-travesty fostered by the Division of Fish and Wildlife (DFW), whose bear-management plan is murderous, not humane or non-lethal.  It kowtows to hunters -- a teeny-tiny percentage of our population -- apparently without a single compassionate, or informed, thought about our black bears.

Isn’t it time for New Jersey residents, most of whom want only to enjoy our open spaces and wildlife, to take on DFW?  One animal advocacy organization, the Animal Protection League of New Jersey, has already been told that zero complaints about bears would still not halt the hunt. (See October 13 post.) 

Since then, the director of the Humane Society of the US-New Jersey highlighted for DFW reps the “out of touch, ineffective, counterproductive, and extreme regulations on the books such as those that allow bear baiting.”  He also “asked that they make even a mild effort to ticket garbage offenders in key concentrated places of complaints or problems.”   

But DFW reps “refused to even commit to that—refused to enforce their own regulation, which would cut down on complaints, which would cut down on “justification” for hunting.”  As a result, Director Brian Hackett concluded that “our DEP is more out of touch and extreme than those in Arizona, Wyoming, and other hunting-heavy states.”

Before Part 2 of the bear hunt can begin in December, let’s barrage Governor Murphy with phone calls, urging him to keep his campaign promise to end the hunt.  Despite his disclaimers, doing so is legally within his power -- and morally, he owes it to the bears.  His half-measure “compromise” last year didn’t satisfy anyone, them least of all.

Please phone the governor (609-292-6000)!



#



Your comments are always welcome at 1moreonce.blogspot.com.


14 comments:

  1. Hunting is a form of legal mass murder. What serial killers do to people, hunters do to animals. They select, stalk, then kill their innocent victim. The motive of the sport hunter is not survival, it's pleasure, a.k.a. fun. They love killing! And it's not a sport. The animal can't shoot back and doesn't even know it's in the game. Hunters are snipers. They all claim to love and respect nature but kill and wound the best nature has to offer. They destroy what they say they care about. This is thoroughly psychopathic. They are so blinded by their love of killing that they cannot see how immoral it is, not to mention cruel. Taking life for one's own pleasure is as evil as one can get. Hunters are the most despicable depraved and lowest form of humanity.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Beautifully written narrative by "Anonymous." I think everyone should read it at least twice to make sure the entirety of the statement sinks in. Well, said!

      Delete
    2. It is clear that you have no actual contact with anyone who actually is a hunter. I know and have known many hunters. To a person, their "joy" and "trophies" of the hunt is the meat that they acquire from hunting. I have never met a hunter who didn't have a great respect for their prey. I live in SC, so I cannot speak for the bear hunters in NJ, but to characterize all hunters the way you have is patently unfair. We as humans have squeezed wildlife into constantly shrinking habitats through our own expansion, and in many cases we have eliminated predator species entirely. Therefore, it is our responsibility as humans to manage the populations of larger species so they do not suffer from diseases and malnutrition. Unfortunately, this means a certain amount of killing. It's more humane to manage population when they are healthy, than to do nothing and have sick and suffering animals.

      Delete
  2. These are not teddy bears!! Dont listen to these well meaning but emotion driven, incredibly naive people who think it's a good idea to allow black bears to overpopulate in a crowded state like NJ. They generally are afraid of people but can be very dangerous when cornered or protecting young. Very rarely,a hungry bear will decide humans are prey, especially children & especially if they run away. Hunting keeps the population at a reasonable level while also teaching bears to be afraid of humans. The woods of NJ are not Disneyland.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is the stupidest blog ever written. As a biologist I can tell you for sure the NJ NW ecosystem can successfully contain 500 bears. That was the number of bears in this area in 1975. Currently there are over 5000 bears in New Jersey. I personally have 10 in my neighborhood. That is an Ecological disaster waiting to happen. Mange, starvation, wasting disease are on the horizon. We have already seen one man killed and eaten. One baby also killed and eaten. I have lost a dog to a bear that was protecting my daughter. They need to be controlled and the population needs to be reset to its normal level. It's simple. Take your emotions out of it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. You morons have youre heads so far up your ass its not even funny.. You sit here acting like you are the most passive peace loving people which is a farse. You threaten the lives and livelyhood of anyone who doesnt align with your unrealistic views on wildlife management. New Jersey has one of the highest human population densities in the country as well as the worlds highest black bear population density per square mile.. Just because you think so called "bear proof" containers are the end all be all answer to bear vs human interactions. It does not mean you can force everyone who has a bear living near them to purchase expensive ineffective cans that simply do not work. Bears are extremely intelligent creatures if they do not succeed the first time they will find a way the second or third time. I have seen on many occasions and bear lay down a "bear proof" garbage can on its side and pop the top simply using its weight. Baiting is tactic used to mainly with bow hunting, in order to present the hunter with a good clear ehtical shot so as to result in a quick and humane kill. We as hunters understand we will never be able to appease the mentally unstable "bear huggers"..there will never be a lawful end to the hunt at the rate the bear population is continuing to rise. Leave the wildlife management to the experts, I dont think you are going to be telling an electrician how to wire a house, a mechanic on how to fix your car, a cardiac doctor on how to treat a patient. So please do everyone a favor and get over youre emotionally driven so called "logic" and leave the biologists to do what they do best. Study and divise plans to keep animal populations at a controlled, healthy, and manageable number for the carrying capacity of the enviromemt in which they live. Have a good day and please start thinking with your brain and not your bleeding hearts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Can't help but notice you've remained anonymous. Typical. Here's how short-sighted you are. Every animal on this planet has a purpose. A purpose that is critical for maintaining a delicate balance in a healthy ecosystem. Remove even one of those animals and a dozen, or more, other animals and the environment in it's habitat is irreversibly & detrimentally changed. Humans, in their endless ignorance, see everything non-human as a nuisance so they remove it and now critical ecosystems are damaged. There are 7 billion humans on this planet - THAT'S TOO MANY FOR THIS PLANET TO SUSTAIN IN A HEALTHY WAY. To keep this planet healthy we need to curb human breeding and allow for all animals to have critical habitat.

      Delete
  5. The nature of Hunters.. two FB Posts:
    https://www.facebook.com/John.Bell.Lafayette/posts/10157725366236532

    https://exposingthebiggame.wordpress.com/2012/11/12/yes-hunters-are-psychopaths-and-sport-hunting-is-serial-killing/?fbclid=IwAR2yA2RTOKymSH2W9L1dEw5mKfIdTHQ0EvmPUJViaz-wpFRjnzP9tYcBH70

    ReplyDelete
  6. I don't mean to hijack this away from the subject of bear hunting, but the practice of hunters having to have special hunting dogs creates a lot
    more unwanted dogs. I heard from a dog rescue that in some areas, there are a lot more dogs needing rescue because the hunters want a dog with certain qualities. They create a situation were dogs are bred but not all the puppies in the litter will be of value to the hunters, so the rescues end up having to take them in. Shelters are overflowing and still the selfish breeding of hunting dogs continues.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. To say that we NEED hunts because WE have destroyed the Predators or have taken land/food resources from them is nonsense. If we STOP taking away their land/food resources and educated people living in Bear Country on proper containment of garbage and interacting with Bears we would eliminate the problem.

    The other choice is to keep taking away land and justify their EXTINCTION... but hunters/fish and wildlife don't want extinction... they want MANAGEMENT of Populations... so there are always ENOUGH to Kill and enough to keep Fish and Wildlife Incomes coming in from Hunting Fees etc.

    ReplyDelete
  9. My thanks to those who commented here, and my apologies if I missed publishing any comments. (If that happened to you, please just re-send the comment and I'll take care of it.)

    I hope readers of my blog posts will also read the comments, which reflect a wide variety of points of view.

    ReplyDelete