Monday, January 20, 2020

Care for foie gras? (The world should say, ‘No!')

Mulard ducks

Imagine a goose or a duck, both sentient beings like us, with perceptions and feelings.  Instead of living normal lives, though, those creatures are fed and fed beyond their desire and beyond capacity. Then they’re slaughtered so their fattened livers can be served to humans as a special and pricey treat.  What a life.  

A so-called “delicacy of French cuisine,” foie gras (“fwa-gra”), or “fatty liver,” is derived from the liver of a goose or duck that has been fattened by a process of force-feeding known as gavage. Through it, the bird consumes more food than would be eaten in the wild or domestically; its liver can grow 6-10 times its normal size and often the animal can’t even stand or walk.  

Despite the fancy-sounding name, foie gras production is hideously cruel -- still another example of how people use non-human animals for their own purposes.

Those involved in producing foie gras take advantage of some waterfowls’ ability “to expand their esophagus and to gain weight, particularly in the liver, in preparation for migration. Unlike many birds, geese and ducks lack a crop.  In the wild, esophageal dilation allows them to swallow large foodstuffs, such as a whole fish, for later digestion.”

                      Gavage                                           c. Gaia
Effective in 2022, New York City has banned foie gras as “inhumane” -- much to the dismay of restaurants that serve it, people who eat it and owners and workers at two duck farms in Sullivan County, NY, where most of the foie gras consumed in the US is produced.  Immigrants involved in foie gras production there depend on their jobs and farm owners fear the worst once they can no longer raise, force feed and slaughter the birds involved. 

In this one instance of animal cruelty, however, the times are changing.  The practices behind foie gras are losing support, and the workers’ and farmers’ wish to continue gavage -- treating helpless sentient animals with gross cruelty -- will stop.  As ways of thinking about animal welfare have gradually changed (“finally,” some might say!) new ways of earning a living will be needed. 

This is much the same situation as that facing Canadians who club baby seals to death for their fur: some (great) day coming, they too will have to make a living some other way. 
    
As a point of interest, foie gras is already banned in California, as well as India, Israel and Britain.  Even where it’s legal, some retailers don’t stock it: Whole Foods stopped selling the product in 1997. 

Phone the governor -- asap!

Beaver
Depending on when you read this, there may still be time -- and it’s worth the try! -- to phone Governor Murphy (609-292-6000) and urge him to veto the dreadful “beaver trapping bill” (A2731/S3407) now on his desk.  He has till noon on Tuesday to decide whether to serve the tiny number of beaver-trappers in NJ or to honor the many of us who continue fighting the increase in trap numbers -- for good reasons.  

Simply removing trapping limits will do absolutely nothing to mitigate any problems caused by beavers.  Worse, trapping beavers is horrifically cruel, with beavers often getting clamped in painful traps and being left to drown to death.

Humane and environmental groups in NJ have worked with local towns on beaver management with proven, non-lethal methods that are NOT harmful to ecosystems and are humane.  We should be addressing this issue in 2020 based on sound science, not 18th century methods.  New Jersey needs a comprehensive beaver management plan.  

#


Your reactions enrich these blog posts!  To comment, please go to 1moreonce.blogspot.com.

No comments:

Post a Comment